Nearly 33% of Bitcoin Supply is Vulnerable to Quantum Attacks Due to This Habit Nearly 33% of Bitcoin Supply is Vulnerable to Quantum Attacks Due to This Habit

Nearly 33% of Bitcoin Supply is Vulnerable to Quantum Attacks Due to This Habit

According to experts, a significant portion of Bitcoin’s (BTC) supply, nearly 33%, is immediately vulnerable to potential quantum computing attacks. Notably, the primary culprit identified is the widespread habit of reusing addresses.

This revelation comes amid rising concerns about Bitcoin’s lack of post-quantum cryptography, which could leave the cryptocurrency exposed to quantum computing threats.

Quantum Computing and Bitcoin: How Address Reuse Increases Vulnerability 

Speaking at the Quantum Bitcoin Summit hosted by Presidio Bitcoin, Dr. Anthony Milton explained that 6.51 million Bitcoin (about 32.7% of the total supply) is immediately quantum vulnerable.

Of these, 70% are vulnerable due to address reuse. Address reuse exposes a massive 4.5 million Bitcoin to quantum risk.

Moreover, his analysis showed that less than 20% of addresses are reused. However, these addresses hold about 6% of all UTXOs (Unspent Transaction Output)

A UTXO refers to the portion of a Bitcoin transaction that a user has not spent yet. It essentially represents the amount of Bitcoin that remains after a transaction is made. So, this amount is available for use in future transactions.

“A majority are single use, which is good.  But, when people reuse addresses,  they reuse them aggressively, right? So a minority for the addresses, they  count for a majority of the reuse,” he said.

Milton also assessed the top 1000 Bitcoin addresses, which hold about 6.08 million, 30% of Bitcoin’s total supply. He concluded that many of these addresses are again reused, which only adds to the quantum vulnerability.

Reused Addresses Among Top 1000 Bitcoin Addresses. Source: YouTube

“Binance have a number of addresses in that top 1,000 representing 600,000 Bitcoin and 500,000 or so is, is reused,” Milton noted.

Despite the risk, Anthony noted that many reused addresses regularly engage in transactions. This means that these coins are still spendable. Moreover, only a small portion of reused addresses haven’t been transacted in over 10 years.

Furthermore, other experts also emphasized that while quantum computing poses a long-term threat to Bitcoin, it is not an immediate issue.

Why? Quantum computers are not yet capable of performing tasks like mining or breaking Bitcoin’s cryptographic security.

“Experts believe fault-tolerant quantum computing (FTQC) is still 5-10 years out (under aggressive timelines). When it arrives, it’ll come fast, like a phase transition,” Presidio Bitcoin added.

Thus, while quantum computing remains a major issue, it’s important to note here that address reuse is not a cryptographic flaw in Bitcoin itself but rather an operational habit of users. 

The good news is that this issue is solvable. Users can use new addresses for each transaction, enable address rotation, consider multi-signature wallets, and stay updated on protocol updates for quantum resistance.

The post Nearly 33% of Bitcoin Supply is Vulnerable to Quantum Attacks Due to This Habit appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Kamina Bashir

https://beincrypto.com/bitcoin-quantum-computing-address-reuse/

2025-07-30 09:57:48

bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 117,768.00 3.13%
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 4,535.47 3.73%
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 3.07 6.24%
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.04%
bnb
BNB (BNB) $ 832.91 1.24%
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 193.36 2.61%
usd-coin
USDC (USDC) $ 0.999805 0.00%
staked-ether
Lido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 4,523.85 3.79%
tron
TRON (TRX) $ 0.358243 0.86%
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.22336 8.00%
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 0.904234 3.74%
wrapped-steth
Wrapped stETH (WSTETH) $ 5,482.79 3.68%
chainlink
Chainlink (LINK) $ 22.37 5.70%
hyperliquid
Hyperliquid (HYPE) $ 44.89 4.89%
wrapped-bitcoin
Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) $ 117,760.00 3.06%
wrapped-beacon-eth
Wrapped Beacon ETH (WBETH) $ 4,875.90 3.75%
sui
Sui (SUI) $ 3.77 5.49%
stellar
Stellar (XLM) $ 0.42267 6.29%
wrapped-eeth
Wrapped eETH (WEETH) $ 4,860.47 3.77%
bitcoin-cash
Bitcoin Cash (BCH) $ 588.75 3.94%
ethena-usde
Ethena USDe (USDE) $ 1.00 0.03%
hedera-hashgraph
Hedera (HBAR) $ 0.249155 5.54%
weth
WETH (WETH) $ 4,534.90 3.78%
avalanche-2
Avalanche (AVAX) $ 23.69 5.76%
litecoin
Litecoin (LTC) $ 120.82 6.91%
the-open-network
Toncoin (TON) $ 3.40 2.61%
leo-token
LEO Token (LEO) $ 9.28 0.33%
usds
USDS (USDS) $ 0.9996 0.00%
shiba-inu
Shiba Inu (SHIB) $ 0.000013 7.18%
binance-bridged-usdt-bnb-smart-chain
Binance Bridged USDT (BNB Smart Chain) (BSC-USD) $ 1.00 0.39%
coinbase-wrapped-btc
Coinbase Wrapped BTC (CBBTC) $ 117,706.00 3.16%
uniswap
Uniswap (UNI) $ 10.92 9.34%
whitebit
WhiteBIT Coin (WBT) $ 45.26 2.78%
polkadot
Polkadot (DOT) $ 3.99 5.63%
okb
OKB (OKB) $ 94.79 8.28%
ethena-staked-usde
Ethena Staked USDe (SUSDE) $ 1.19 0.07%
bitget-token
Bitget Token (BGB) $ 4.55 4.88%
crypto-com-chain
Cronos (CRO) $ 0.15138 8.70%
ethena
Ethena (ENA) $ 0.725404 7.42%
aave
Aave (AAVE) $ 310.77 5.06%
pepe
Pepe (PEPE) $ 0.000011 9.13%
monero
Monero (XMR) $ 247.61 4.06%
dai
Dai (DAI) $ 0.999808 0.01%
mantle
Mantle (MNT) $ 1.10 2.72%
bittensor
Bittensor (TAO) $ 367.99 6.27%
near
NEAR Protocol (NEAR) $ 2.79 4.80%
ethereum-classic
Ethereum Classic (ETC) $ 22.28 7.60%
aptos
Aptos (APT) $ 4.74 4.68%
ondo-finance
Ondo (ONDO) $ 0.996246 6.56%
pi-network
Pi Network (PI) $ 0.380282 4.81%